Tesla's Model S.
(Credit:
Wayne Cunningham/CNET)
Tesla, the electric-car maker, has made good on its promise of releasing logs on the New York Times' review of its Model S. And its founder and CEO Elon Musk has wasted no time trying to discredit that review.
According to Musk, his company faced some issues with a review by television show Top Gear years ago. That experience, in which the show "pretended that our
car ran out of energy and had to be pushed back to the garage," prompted him to closely monitor media reviews.
"While the vast majority of journalists are honest, some believe the facts shouldn't get in the way of a salacious story," Musk wrote in a blog post yesterday, justifying his company's use of monitoring technology in cars tapped for media reviews.
Musk then turned his attention to the review published on Sunday by the Times' John Broder. In that, Broder criticized the Model S for range issues and problems in low-temperature environments. Musk claims, however, that Broder's account of what happens was not factual.
Here's a brief list of issues Musk discovered in the logs:
- Despite Broder saying that he called a flatbed truck after the Model S battery ran out of energy, the logs show that he didn't, in fact, run out of energy, according to Musk.
- Musk charged Broder with an "obvious violation of common sense" when he he disconnected the Tesla's charging cable when its range was at 32 miles and his trip back was 61 miles.
- Musk says that the logs show Broder never set his cruise control to 54 mph to save on energy, as he suggested, and instead was driving at speeds between 65 mph and 81 mph.
- Because cabin temperature can impact energy usage, Broder said that he reduced it. However, Musk claims that the temperature was turned up from 72 degrees to 74 degrees.
"When the facts didn't suit his opinion, he simply changed the facts," Musk said of Broder. "Our request of The New York Times is simple and fair: please investigate this article and determine the truth."
Broder has yet to respond publicly to Musk's latest charges, but he did share his two cents in a column on Tuesday responding to some of the claims Musk published on Twitter (and are also in the latest blog post). Broder started off his defense in defiance of Musk's assertions: "my account [of the test drive] was not fake."
Broder went on to say that while certain recommendations by Tesla weren't followed, including that he "should have pluggested in the car overnight in Connectict, particularly given the cold temperature," he tried to frame his review around "practicality" and "normal use."
"Now that Tesla is striving to be a mass-market automaker, it cannot realistically expect all 20,000 buyers a year (the Model S sales goal) to be electric-car acolytes who will plug in at every Walmart stop," Broder argued.
Given the back-and-forth that has already occurred around this review, expect for Broder to respond to Musk's claims.
Tesla releases logs on disputed NYT car review
This article
Tesla releases logs on disputed NYT car review
can be opened in url
https://newssibilous.blogspot.com/2013/02/tesla-releases-logs-on-disputed-nyt-car.html
Tesla releases logs on disputed NYT car review
